Gazette Notification of Amendment in retention period of residence in case of retirement or terminal leave

Gazette Notification of Amendment in retention period of residence in case of retirement or terminal leave

MINISTRY OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
(Directorate of Estates)
NOTIFICATION

New Delhi, the 19th June, 2013

    G.S.R. 444(E).-In pursuance of provisions of rule 45 of the Fundamental Rules, the President hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Allotment of Government Residences (General Pool in Delhi) Rules, 1963, namely :-

1.    Short Title & Commencement:

    (1) These may be called the Allotment of Government Residences (General Pool in Delhi) Amendment Rules, 2013.

    (2) They shall be deemed to have come into force on 23rd April, 2013.

2.    In the Allotment of Government Residences (General Pool in Delhi) Rules, 1963,

(i) In supplementary Rule 317-B-11, in the table below sub-rule (2), the entry against item (ii) relating in retirement or terminal leave, occurring under column relating to permissible period of retention of the residence shall be substituted by the following entries:-

    (a) In cases of accommodation allotted prior to 1-7-2013 : 2 months on normal licence fee, another 2 months on double of the normal licence fee, further 2 months on four times of the normal licence fee and subsequent 2 months on six times of the normal fee.
    (b) In cases of accommodation allotted on or after 1-7-2013 : 2 months on normal licence fee, another 2 months on double of the normal licence fee and further 2 months on four times of the normal licence fee.

(ii) for the first proviso to Supplementary Rule 317-B-22, the following proviso shall be substituted, namely: -

    “Provided that an officer, in special cases, except in case of death and retirement or terminal leave, may be allowed by Directorate of Estates to retain a residence for a period not exceeding 6 months beyond the period permitted under SR 317-B-11(2), on payment of twice the flat rate of licence fee or twice the licence fee he was paying, whichever is higher.

(iii) in Supplementary Rule 317-B-22, the second proviso shall be omitted.

[F. No.12035/28/96-Pol.II (Vol.II)]
S.K. JAIN, Dy. Director of Estates (Policy)

source-http://estates.nic.in/WriteReadData/dlcirculars/Circulars20252.pdf